and Teply

Ok, first of all, I never probably said that about the ik and whatnot- I know I did say that your brand of philiosophy is verbose and uncultured, and like a refuse doll to be held. That is accurate. And secondly, this talk about flux and flow- it's old news! I made this argument three years ago! Check the August 2005 issue of the Philosopher's Glove and you see that I've likened the philosophy to a bear hunt. Sneaking but not finding, until a find is made and all hell breaks loose! It's not exactly flux and flow, but it is an animal allegory philosophical tie-in. You rat! Although I do agree that the obersever is perhaps the pinnacle of philosopher. Just make the point without thieving, you snark!
In accuatlity, I would say that what we percieve to be real, is the boundary of what we are willing to contemplate. If it falls outside that realm, then it is nonsense. So one must reign in the entirety of the universe, or else one must consider things that seem wacky. I mean REALLY WACKY! Like feet heads and whatnot. Refute that, if you can!
Highest regards,
Fane Kiela, PhD